<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calling a 32-bit System Command from a Script in x64 Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottiestech.info/2009/06/20/calling-a-32-bit-system-command-from-a-script-in-x64-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottiestech.info/2009/06/20/calling-a-32-bit-system-command-from-a-script-in-x64-windows/</link>
	<description>A chimpanzee and two trainees could run her!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottie</title>
		<link>http://scottiestech.info/2009/06/20/calling-a-32-bit-system-command-from-a-script-in-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottiestech.info/?p=221#comment-386</guid>
		<description>I explained how I made the executable here:

http://scottiestech.info/2009/02/14/how-to-determine-the-master-browser-in-a-windows-workgroup/

And check your e-mail for the source!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I explained how I made the executable here:</p>
<p><a href="http://scottiestech.info/2009/02/14/how-to-determine-the-master-browser-in-a-windows-workgroup/" rel="nofollow">http://scottiestech.info/2009/02/14/how-to-determine-the-master-browser-in-a-windows-workgroup/</a></p>
<p>And check your e-mail for the source!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Farmwald</title>
		<link>http://scottiestech.info/2009/06/20/calling-a-32-bit-system-command-from-a-script-in-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Farmwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 08:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottiestech.info/?p=221#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note.

I had to add &quot;C:\\Windows&quot; as I was running Ruby from another drive than C.

How do you make the distributable .exe for a ruby program? Also, do you share the source code for the LAN Scanning Tool? I just wrote something similar and was curious.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note.</p>
<p>I had to add &#8220;C:\\Windows&#8221; as I was running Ruby from another drive than C.</p>
<p>How do you make the distributable .exe for a ruby program? Also, do you share the source code for the LAN Scanning Tool? I just wrote something similar and was curious.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottie</title>
		<link>http://scottiestech.info/2009/06/20/calling-a-32-bit-system-command-from-a-script-in-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottiestech.info/?p=221#comment-280</guid>
		<description>D&#039;OH! You are absolutely correct. I&#039;ll update the article. Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;OH! You are absolutely correct. I&#8217;ll update the article. Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamleong</title>
		<link>http://scottiestech.info/2009/06/20/calling-a-32-bit-system-command-from-a-script-in-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>kamleong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottiestech.info/?p=221#comment-279</guid>
		<description>You mentioned that &quot;The 32-bit commands are in the system32 folder, and the 64-bit commands are stored in the SysWOW64 directory. x64 Windows looks in SysWOW64 by default when you call a command line function.&quot;. I read somewhere else that SysWOW64 directory actually stores the 32-bit (instead of 64-bit) binaries. That only exist on a x64 Windows. The system32 folder always stores the &quot;native&quot; binary of the OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mentioned that &#8220;The 32-bit commands are in the system32 folder, and the 64-bit commands are stored in the SysWOW64 directory. x64 Windows looks in SysWOW64 by default when you call a command line function.&#8221;. I read somewhere else that SysWOW64 directory actually stores the 32-bit (instead of 64-bit) binaries. That only exist on a x64 Windows. The system32 folder always stores the &#8220;native&#8221; binary of the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamleong</title>
		<link>http://scottiestech.info/2009/06/20/calling-a-32-bit-system-command-from-a-script-in-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>kamleong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottiestech.info/?p=221#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent example and explanation on the Windows\sysnative virtual folder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent example and explanation on the Windows\sysnative virtual folder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

